Special issue on UNGA 77 and the IMF/World Bank annual meetings 2022
Issue 1 — 17 October 2022
This is a special issue of the PCDE’s Multilateral Monitor. It is also the inaugural issue. The IMF/World Bank Annual Meetings 2022 have now concluded, and the delegations have now left Washington DC. From 13-27 September, New York hosted the 77th Session of the General Assembly (UNGA77) only for the debates to start again in DC on October 10. The end of the IMF/World Bank Annual Meetings marks the end of annual multilateral festivity season. It is a good time to take stock of the issues and trends in the multilateral policy space.
Surveying the rich agenda of debates held in the midst of multiple crisis, this Special Issue focuses on the state of the debate on payments and digital policy and the role of digital technology. The message I heard in UNGA77 and the IMF/WB Annual Meetings 2022 was consistent and clear:
(1) In an uncertain time few things are certain, and digitalization is one of them. I heard that stated by a private sector leader, Carlos Vila of BBVA speaking for the Institute of International Finance (IIF) Annual Meeting -also held in DC on the margins of the IMF/WB meetings. I heard the same message from Pramod Varma- Chief Architect of Aadhar & India Stack- speaking at the New Economy Forum, where he said: “Digital is not an option, digital public infrastructure is coming.”
(2) The private sector has led digitalization so far, but many remain excluded and the answer to that is digital public goods and digital public infrastructure. In an UNGA77 event The Future of Digital Cooperation, the Digital Public Goods Charter was launched as a coalition and a call to action “to advance the use of digital public goods and enable countries to build safe, trusted and inclusive digital public infrastructure.”
While the definition and scope of digital public goods and digital public infrastructure remains vague, the message echoed across the sessions of UNGA and the Annual Meetings this year. This Issue will review these various conversations.
What I missed in these sessions was a private sector voice. Each panel on this topic during the Annual Meetings advocated for government solutions and asserted the important role of the private sector to sustain digital public infrastructure, yet none of the panels included a speaker from the private sector. An observation that merits longer conversation — especially considering the potential of this new role of government to change the market dynamics in the digital economy. Here, I would only echo the call of Mastercard Vice Chairman — Amb. Mike Froman — on IMF Today "for more collaboration across the private sector and governments to address the needs of communities all over the world.”
(3) New digital technology poses new risks that challenge our existing risk frameworks and risk mitigation tools. Every session on digital flagged the cybersecurity risk without elaborating on it. CBDC and Crypto currencies had their fair share of the risk conversation, especially from monetary stability lens.
I was left with the sense that we are still not positioning cybersecurity accurately in the conversation: cybersecurity should not be the risk that we will manage after choosing the method of building the digital public infrastructure. Cybersecurity should be a factor in choosing the way we build digital public infrastructure. An important distinction.
I hope you enjoy this Special Issue of the Multilateral Monitor and I invite you to share your suggestions for digital policy initiatives by multilateral institutions that you think merits tracking in our future issues. Send your suggestions to pcde@mastercard.com.
EDITOR
Heba Shamas
VP Multilateral Engagement
Global Public Policy
DPG Charter is an organizing framework for mobilizing finance, action, and advocacy to advance the use of digital public goods. The Charter endorses the Global Public Goods Alliance (DPGA) definition of Digital public goods as “open-source software, open data, open AI models, open standards, and open content that adhere to privacy and other applicable laws and best practices, do no harm by design, and help attain the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Managed by the Digital Public Goods Alliance and the Digital Impact Alliance (DIAL) the Charter and the growing movement around DPG is intended to challenge the status quo in the delivery of digitalization with the objectives of advancing inclusion, enabling local and national solutions, and promoting cross-border collaboration. The event on The Future of Digital Cooperation: Building resilience through safe, trusted, and inclusive digital public infrastructure was “the first major gathering of countries at the UNGA to advance common approaches to building digital public infrastructure.” This is a good place to start for understanding the global effort on this agenda, the level of support and mobilization, future milestones, and opportunities for engagement
Bringing together Lucy Harris, the co-lead of the Digital Public Goods Alliance, and Pramod Varma, the chief architect of Aadhaar and other parts of the India Stack, with leading staff of the IMF Fiscal Affairs Department to debate the role of digital public infrastructure in the transformation of digital finance including building blocks such as digital ID, e-payments, and data sharing solutions. Mr. Pramod’s explains digital public infrastructure as publicly built digital infrastructure as opposed to private. He also clarifies the benefits of the public nature in terms of interoperability of systems, portability of data, and sovereign control. This understanding was shared by Ms. Harris who highlighted in particular the issues of vendor lock-in and risk of market monopoly. She advocated for digital public goods to mitigate this risk ensure country sovereignty and control over DPIs systems. The session also shows that the IMF is positioned as a provider of advice in this space linking both the cross-country knowledge of digitalization effort and IMF expertise on public finance including developing cost estimators of DPI projects.
This session debates the relative value of two new foundational types of payments infrastructure: fast payments and CBDC. Piero Cipollone, Deputy Governor of the Bank of Italy and Sopnendu Mohanty, Chief Fintech Officer at the Monetary Authority of Singapore compare and contrasted the fast payments experience in Europe and Singapore shedding light on the operation of fast payment and the space that it leaves for CBDC innovation in the future. The session provides good insights on cost and pricing of payments in different contexts, the public good of standardization, reducing the cost of cross-border payment, CBDC interoperability, and asset tokenization. While Mr. Cipollone advocated strongly for solving today’s problems using today’s solutions while innovating, testing, and evaluating implications of CBDC, Mr. Mohanty advocated for choice in payment through sequenced innovation: asset tokenization and tokenized asset market then digital currency. Through an intervention from the floor, Cecilia Skingsley, Director of the BIS Innovation Hub provides insight on how Project Nexus aims to lower the cost of cross-border payment by connecting real time payment systems. She stressed however that “while technology can take us part of the way but the real challenging thing is to agree on governance, rule books, make sure the ecosystem is onboarding this, dispute resolution and the like.” Positioning the role of central banks in payments innovation, she added: “we need to push the private sector into new equilibrium, we are at this stage in payments.”
Financial inclusion is often offered as the rationale for introducing CBDC. This seminar brought centrals banks and international organizations perspective to examine the validity of CBDC’s potential to address financial inclusion. The message was consistent- CBDC has potential because of its legal tender, programmability, competition enhancing features but only if it was properly designed. The panel went ahead to debate how this potential can materialize. Few insights stand out: payments is only one step and financial inclusion depends on financial sector intermediation offering saving and insurance products, CBDC design should mitigate the risk of disintermediation (Queen Maxima), Successful CBDC system has to be built on Public Private Partnership (Bo Li, IMF Deputy Managing Director), CBDC needs to be part of a package of policies to address hurdles to financial inclusion (Cecilia Skingsley, Head of the BIS Innovation Hub), and there are demand side barriers to financial inclusion such as preference for cash that CBDC design need to address to solve for financial exclusion (Kristalina Georgieva, IMF Managing Director). The jury is still out. It is an if but, as as Queen Maxima said in her opening remarks, it is a big if. You can watch the entire event here.
Click here for PDF of this issue.