Published: 24 January 2024 | Updated: 23 June 2026
First-party fraud — when a customer purposely or accidentally disputes legitimate transactions — has been growing in recent years. And unfortunately, it shows no signs of slowing down. In fact, retailers and issuers reported that around 20% of disputes stemmed from first-party fraud, or friendly fraud, in 2025, according to Mastercard and Javelin’s research.
One reason it’s an ongoing issue: Retailers and issuers often don’t have all the data and intelligence they need to tell true fraud from first-party fraud. As a result, most disputes are still coded as fraud even though many are legitimate purchases.
This makes it more critical for retailers and issuers to identify first-party fraud, understand why it’s happening and prevent the downstream impacts — particularly the resulting disputes and chargebacks.
First-party fraud, or friendly fraud, occurs when a legitimate customer disputes a transaction they actually authorized, either intentionally or because they don’t recognize the charge (transaction confusion).
The easiest way to prevent unnecessary chargebacks is to resolve the underlying issue quickly—for example, by offering the customer context about a charge, answering a question about the status of an order or issuing a refund when appropriate.
True fraud, by contrast, involves unauthorized use of a customer’s account by a third party. These transactions require immediate action to avoid further financial loss, including fraud controls like card locking or reissuance.
There are two main reasons first-party fraud is so persistent:
As people transact digitally more often and on a growing number of devices like phones, tablets or even smartwatches, transaction confusion is rising. Online banking is now the main way consumers review their purchase activity, but the retailer name and other details shown are not always recognizable.
One eye-opening stat: Almost half of consumers (48%) have disputed one or more charges that they later realized were actually legitimate, according to Mastercard and Datos Insights’ research.
‘Household fraud’ is also rising. This form of friendly fraud occurs when someone who lives in the same home as the cardholder authorizes a transaction without their knowledge. It is becoming more common as shared accounts, like streaming and other subscription services, store card information and allow anyone with access to make purchases.
Not all first-party fraud is caused by confusion. A fast-growing share stems from consumers using the chargeback process as a way to avoid paying for their purchase. This may occur due to a problem such as a delivery delay, or because the customer was simply unhappy with their purchase.
Traditionally, the expectation was that consumers would contact the retailer directly to resolve any issues. Now, more are going directly to the issuer instead, bypassing the retailer — even when they have generous return and exchange policies designed to make customers happy.
More than four in five issuers (83%) say increasing customer awareness of the dispute process is driving rising chargeback volumes, and over three-quarters of retailers (77%) believe disputing transactions has become too easy, according to Mastercard and Javelin’s 2026 white paper.
While this is technically a misuse of the dispute process, it is the new reality. Retailers and issuers must work together to motivate consumers to reach out to the retailer when they have issues.
Collaborative data-sharing technologies are already helping dispute teams reduce first-party fraud — without requiring perfect distinction between true fraud and friendly fraud.
Two solutions are making an immediate impact:
As disputes continue to rise, issuers and retailers will need solutions that make it easier to accurately distinguish true fraud from first-party fraud. That means using shared data — like transaction history, device ID and account behaviour — to identify legitimate transactions flagged as fraud.
By collaborating more closely, issuers and retailers can act faster to prevent revenue loss and make the customer experience frictionless. These capabilities will be especially critical for digital-first retailers, which tend to see some of the highest levels of first-party fraud.
First-party fraud sits at the intersection of customer behaviour, transaction clarity and dispute workflows. No single party has a complete view.
Improving outcomes demands real-time coordination between issuers and retailers, powered by shared data. This collaborative approach can reduce unnecessary chargebacks, protect revenue and strengthen customer trust.
Discover how Ethoca Consumer Clarity™ and Ethoca Alerts can help improve dispute outcomes at scale.
First-party fraud happens when a customer disputes a transaction they authorized, either intentionally or due to confusion. It often results in unnecessary chargebacks.
First-party fraud closely resembles true fraud in dispute systems, and retailers and issuers often lack the shared data needed to accurately distinguish between legitimate and unauthorized transactions.
The two primary drivers of first-party fraud are transaction confusion, when consumers struggle to recognize charges on their statement, and misuse of the dispute process, when they use chargebacks to avoid paying for purchases.
Issuers and retailers can prevent first-party fraud by adopting collaborative solutions that provide clear purchase details, reducing transaction confusion. Solutions that enable near real-time dispute response can also help resolve issues early, before they escalate into chargebacks.